"A Perfect Comic"

That's what Tim Conway said in a brief audio clip on the CBS World News Roundup to describe Harvey Korman, who died yesterday from complications from an abdominal aortic aneurysm at the age of 81.

Korman will be remembered for many things, including his long run on "The Carol Burnett Show" (during which he won four Emmys and a Golden Globe) and his role as Hedy Lamarr ("That's Hedley!") in Blazing Saddles, and many, many other parts over his decades-long career.

But what was first came to my mind when I heard that he had passed away? His not one, not two but three roles in The Star Wars Holiday Special.

Yes, I am a sick man.

Rest in peace, Mr. Korman.

Friday is Bring Your Action Figure to Work Day

For the last two weeks, select co-workers and I have brought toys to work.

Maybe we've done it because we're bored. Maybe we've done it because we're geeks. Maybe we've done it because our place of employemnt is relentlessly bland--I've been in banks that were more visually stimulating. Or maybe we just bloody well felt like bringing toys to work.

Reactions amongst our other co-workers have been mixed. Some think the action figures are cool. Others think they reveal us to be not quite right in our heads. Still others ignore the situation entirely (then again, they ignore us as co-workers and human beings as well, so maybe it's best that they not take notice).

Whatever. They make us smile. And anything that makes us smile makes through the last workday of the week that much easier.

Three Minutes

Three minutes is not a great length of time. It takes longer--sometimes much longer--to do many things, like take a shower, wait for a bus or train, or eat dinner.

There are other times when three minutes can seem like an afternoon--like when you get on your exercycle after not having used it as anything but a convenient place to hand my shirts and stack my pants for at least the last couple of years and ride it for exactly that long.

I don't know why I chose Memorial Day to resume the slow climb to being in shape, or why I decided to clear the wire hangers off the handlebars (you thought I was kidding about throwing my clothing there, didn't you?) after having walked to and from the Davis to see Forgetting Sarah Marshall (which wasn't bad, but wasn't great either) and hopped aboard.

Maybe it was because eating better has reduced my weight, but at too slow a rate for my satisfaction. Or maybe it was because I got tired of having an enormous piece of unused hardware in my apartment. (And for those of you who read that as a euphamism for something dirty...you've been on Dune way too long. Then again, I wrote it, and I thought it sounded like something something dirty, so...yeah, Dune.) Or maybe I'd just like to see my feet a little more often.

Whatever the reason, last night I cleared off the Schwinn Aerodyne, plugged in the Panasonic cassette player I'd bought that afternoon from from Laurie's Planet of Sound (it's bright yellow, weighs about 10 pounds and practically screams 1975 from its back-mounted speaker), popped in "Mix Tape #6" (don't ask me why I needed that exact tape, especially since I recorded it about 10 years ago and can't remember what's on it) and began by stretching while Liz Phair sand "Fuck and Run."

After about 30 seconds of reaching towrd the hardwood floor while it and my hamstrings mocked me mercilessly, I threw my left leg over the seat of the Aerodyne and hit the ON button. The display came up, the run time was adjusted down to three minutes (from the previously loft goal of four), and the start button was pressed.

The large fan that takes the place of the front wheel began to spin and throw out jets of air throughout La Casa del Terror, sending loose papers and nervous cats flying in all directions. The wheel/fan made a continual "ping" as I pedaled, as if something were sticking up through the grate and hitting it, but nothing was visible and the pedals worked as they should.

So...pedal..yeah...ow.

It took only three minutes, though it seemed much longer--every time I looked down at the timer, expecting a minute to have gone by, only to find ten seconds had elapsed--to discover how out of shape I truly am. After that brief effort, my legs were leaden and I needed a long drink of ice-cold water. And this morning, I felt soreness in parts of my body whose existence I'd almost entirely forgotten. (Those of you thinking dirty thoughts again...seriously, Dune.)

Does this mean I won't get back on again tonight for another three minutes? Hell no. I plan on doing three minutes a night, every night, no matter how late I get in or how tired I am, until three minutes feels easy enough for me to move it up to four. Then five. Then six. Then on and on until I feel like I can ride forever. (Again...oh, never mind.)

In Through the Out Door

Today, I closed down Adoresixtyfour.com for the last time.

No, I hadn't finished migrating all of my old files from there to here--there are still essays, photos and movie reviews missing, and they'll stay missing for a while (or at least until I devote a lazy summer afternoon to uploading files from home).

The time had finally come to say goodbye. I wasn't using the old site anymore, and I was still being charged for it. More than anything else, though, it was time to let go of that part of me that started that site back in October 2001 at the urging of JB, Junebug and Red Secretary, among others, and most of those initial readers have stayed with me the whole time. For your love and support all these years, I remain grateful.

So this is now the only place where you can read my rambling diatribes and see my pictures of what is or was Chicago. It's a good thing, really--since I started this new version of the old blog, I've updated around twice a week (as opposed to the old site, where I'd update twice a month, if that).

One door closes. Another opens. This one will likely be open for quite some time. C'mon in and say "Hi."

Public Land, Private Gain, Part 2

As I (and many others) predicted yesterday, the Chicago Plan Commission approved the move of the Chicago Children's Museum from their cramped quarters on Navy Pier to new, spacious, subterranean digs in Grant Park by a vote of 13 to 2. Kudos to Commission members Doris Holleb and Lyneir Richardson for proving that they are, in fact, vertebrates. The rest of the members? I'm not so sure. (Do not be surpised if Holleb and Richardson are wished into the cornfield--and off the Commission--by His Honor in the near future.)

Not that the museum will be jammed into the turf tomorrow. There are many steps to be taken before the first shovel of dirt is thrown aside--the next being the City Council's zoning committee, which must approve the measure before it's brought up before the full council.

While many members of the City Council also do whatever the mayor tells them, they have a more difficult decision with consequences that reach well beyond the placement of the museum itself. The alderman of the ward in which the proposed new museum location resides, Brendan Reilly, opposes the plan. Usually, if an alderman opposes a project within the boundaries of his or her ward, that project dies a swift death.

So...are the members of the City Council willing to incur the considerable wrath of the mayor by protecting their longstanding privilege of giving a stamp of approval to anything that happens within their individual wards? Or will they cut out the middleman and slit their own throats by approving the measure over the local alderman's wishes, opening up the substantial probability that their own ward projects will now be fair game for the whims, wishes and warfare of their fellow council members? We shall see.

We shall also see if the Chicago Children's Museum's reputation, already damaged by the museum board's eagerness to jam this ill-conceived plan down the throats of the citizens of this city, continues to erode to the point where so much ill will has been generate that no one will want to go anywhere near their institution, no matter where it is eventually built.

My Left Foot

Last night, while on my way home, I wandered through the Sears at State and Madison, killing time before heading back to La Casa del Terror to feed the cats, watch Countdown with Keith Olbermann and whip up the latest batch of "bachelor's stew," which consists of whatever remains in the refrigerator or kitchen cupboards thrown into a bowl with lots of seasoning (or, at least, crushed red peppers) and a little prayer.

I wasn't looking for anything in particular--I've bought plenty of shirts and pants lately, but could always use a few more--and wound up in the shoe department, scanning the clearance shelves for something in my size that wasn't eye-burstingly awful. (There are reasons why these things wind up on the discount shelf.) My everyday shoes are starting to get a bit worn, and they'll need to be replaced sooner or later (prpbably sooner).

Finally, I spotted a "12" on a GPX box--good brand, decent price, could be something. I opened the box with hope...and held it open in confusion. I liked the look of the shoe in the box--I often wear bowling-style shoes, even though I rarely bowl and even when I do, I'm as likely to bowl a 50 as a 150--but there was the problem: There was just one shoe in the box, not a pair. I looked on the shelves and even cracked a few adjacent boxes, but the left shoe had gone missing. Where could it have gone? Did somebody walk out with one new shoe and leave the other behind?

I continued rooting around the shoe department, mostly wincing at either the styles of shoes I didn't like or the prices of shoes I did. I chanced upon another GPX box with my size on its side, and the style on display was very similar to the solo shoe I'd encounter before. I flipped the lid open and...found another right shoe with the left one nowhere in sight.

Did some shoplifter with two left feet put on shoes from two different styles and hope no one would notice? Were the left shoes lonely where they were/are? Did my left foot do something to offend the universe as a whole, or just the deity governing footwear in particular?

I left Sears with out anything but the money I had in my wallet when I came through the revolving door and the disappointment handed to me within.

Public Land, Private Gain

Millennium Park in downtown Chicago has always provoked mixed feelings.

Carved out of the northern end of the much larger Grant Park, Millennium Park is undeniably one of the most spectacular locations in the whole city: It has memorable sculptures (including the ultra-shiny Cloud Gate, better known locally as "The Bean"); a fountain visitors are encouraged to walk in that has building-high video screens at either end that spit water out of the faces projected there; a relaxing cafe; a wintertime iceskating rink; a bridge and music pavilion designed by world-renowned architect Frank Gehry; and a panoramic view of one of the greatest skylines on the planet.

The park also, unfortunately, represents much civic blundering: It ran well over budget; numerous deadlines for completion were blown (as the name implies, it was supposed to open in 2000--it didn't open until 2004); and that relaxing cafe is run by a group that just happens to have connections to the city's longtime mayor, Richard M. Daley and just happens to have gotten a great deal on the lease. (Daley has long denied that he had anything to do with what, to all appearances, was a sweetheart deal. However, given the numerous investigations and subsequent convictions for corruption throughout Daley's administration, doubts continue to linger.)

Now, the city is trying to add more to the area, already ten pounds in a five-pound bag, by moving the Chicago Children's Museum from its cramped quarters at Navy Pier to a a spot in Grant Park adjacent to Millennium Park currently occupied by a plaza named for Daley's father, Richard J. Daley (also a long-serving mayor of the city).

Numerous objections have been raised to this plan by groups concerned about protecting the intergity of the parks (and point to decades of legal precedents prohibiting buildings in public parks), by condo owners concerned about the increase in traffic in what is already a congested area, and by average citizens who worry that such a deal opens the door further for giving public land over to private institutions (even a not-for-profit one like the Children's Museum).

The mayor has no such concerns. He has been a vocal--even vehement--supporter of the move, sometimes literally and hysterically shouting down detractors of the plan as anti-child or racist.

I think it's a bad idea as well, but mostly because of the age-old realtor's mantra: location, location, location. It's a lousy spot for a hot dog stand, much less a museum. It's an awkward, out-of-character attachment to either park, a square peg being rammed into a round hole with excessive force. Other sites have been proposed, especially by the Chicago Tribune which has run a series of editorials suggesting alternate sites where the museum might be a better fit, like the "museum campus" immediately south of the downtown area (a campus that already attracts millions of visitors, including many children, every year) or areas that could use the attention the museum would attract, like Garfield Park on the city's West Side, a long-ignored jewel that could bask in the light shined on it by the presence of such a world-class institution.

The museum's choice of location--and the objections to it--have caused the board to attempt to please everyone with changes to the design of the structure, which now would reside mostly underground. That would be great if the children were moles or earthworms. That would also be great if citizens who, funny enough, would like to use the park land as park land could actually do so; the footprint of the new museum, even after it's been shovel as far into the ground as possible, still makes the land above it virtually useless.

It does not seem, however, that either the museum board or the mayor have any interest in entertaining suggestions for other, more suitable locations. The proposal for the move goes before the city's Plan Commission today, and it's expected to pass with little oppostition from the Commission board, which is entirely appointed by (guess who?) Mayor Daley. While civic groups and individual protestors will likely make noise at the Commission meeting today, I would not be the least surprised to see each commissioner take turns curling up in the mayor's lap and getting a tummy rub from His Honor. That would be far more likely than even one of the commissioners standing up and saying, in a clear and firm voice, "This is wrong, sir."

It does not matter whether this move is what's best for the parks, the city, the museum or, most importantly, the children. It's what the mayor wants. And what this mayor wants--from the midnight demolition to the lakefront airport, Meigs Field, to the hideous "renovation" of Soldier Field, the Bears' football stadium that now looks like the mothership from Close Encounters of the Third Kind has crashed within its classically columned walls--this mayor gets.